Translate

Audit Cycle And Procedures



 
1.0 INTRODUCTION
An audit can be carried out on organizations, both large and small, and  both new and well-established.  This note focuses on the cycle or stages in the modern audit of an  established
company which is big enough to have a comprehensive  system of accounting and record keeping and a system of controls over  those records.

2.0 OBJECTIVES
At the end of this note, you should be able to:
· explain audit cycle
· outline the stages in the audit cycle
· describe the stages in the audit.
                            
3.0 MAIN CONTENT
3.1 Audit Cycle and Procedures
Audit cycle refers to the stages in the conduct of an audit from the  beginning to the end. The stages in the modern audit can be summarised  as follows.
(i) Background research;
(ii) Preparation of the audit plan;
(iii) Accounting system review;
(iv) Internal control system review;
(iv) Substantive testing;
(v) Analytical review techniques;
(vi) Analytical review of financial statements;
(vii) Preparation and signing of report.
These stages will be explained below.

3.1.1 Background Research
Before commencing the audit proper, the auditor must discover as much  as possible:
(a) the present condition and future prospects of the industry of  which his client is a part;
(b) the past history and the present condition and future prospects of  his client;
 (c) the management and key personnel of his client and recent  changes;
(d) the products and manufacturing and trading processes of the  client and recent changes;
(e) the locations of all his client’s operations;
(f) difficulties encountered by the client in manufacturing, trading,  expanding, contracting, labour relations or financing;
(g) problems in accounting or in internal control systems;
(h) problems in accounting measurement like in stock valuation and  income recognition;
(i) problems likely to lead to audit risk like the difficulty of  assessing the value of long-term contracts in a civil engineering  business;
(j) problems likely to be met in carrying out the audit, for example,  distant locations, tight timing problems, or large staff  requirements on stocktaking attendance;
(k) changes in law or accounting practice which may affect the  client.

This background research will be done by reading or interviewing the
following.

(i) Previous years’ audit files;
(ii) Members of staff of audit who have been previously engaged on  the audit;
(iii) Published material concerning the client’s company and industry;
(iv) The company’s interim, internal and management accounts;
(viii) The management of the enterprise.
The auditor must focus his audit, particularly on areas of special  difficulty and risk in order to carry out a comprehensive and effective  audit which is nevertheless efficient in terms of time spent. In addition,  the evaluation of many areas in the financial statements must entail a  consideration of the whole circumstances of the client.

3.1.2 The Audit Plan
The auditor must plan his audit in some detail and the plan will involve  preparation of an overall audit plan showing:
(a) an outline of the audit work to be done on each area of the  client’s systems and financial statements;
(b) the staff who will do the work;
(c) the location of the audit;
(d) the timing of the work to be done;
(e) a budget of time and costs.
The plan must be made to fit in with the client’s timing requirement and  with the client’s ability to produce necessary analyses and summaries.

3.1.3 Accounting System Review
The auditor must:
(a) ascertain by asking questions;
(b) record on paper;
(c) corroborate his record (confirm that the record is correct);
(d) review for adequacy and for planning of tests;
(e) test to determine that it always works as it is supposed to;
(f) evaluate and
(g) form a conclusion on the adequacy of the client’s system for  documenting and recording the transactions, assets and liabilities  of the client in the books of account and other records. This is  because:

 (i) the Companies Act requires the auditor to investigate and report  on the company keeping of “proper” accounting records;
(ii) the books of account and other records form the basis for the  preparation of the financial statements.

3.1.4 Internal Control System Review
Be reminded that internal controls are procedures which ensure that all  transactions, assets and liabilities are recorded correctly.
The auditor should:
(a) ascertain;
(b) record;
(c) corroborate the record;
(d) review;
(e) test;
(f) evaluate and
(g) form a conclusion on the adequacy of the client’s system of  internal control.

The objectives of the accounting systems and internal control systems  investigations are to enable the auditor to have evidence that:
(i) the client maintains adequate books and records;
(ii) the client has a system of internal controls over the processing  and recording of transactions such that all transactions are  recorded correctly both numerically and in principle;
(iii) the books of account can be relied on to form a reliable basis for  the preparation of the accounts.

Thus, it is not necessary for the auditor to vouch for every transaction  recorded in the books. He will rely upon the system. If the system is  satisfactory, then he can substitute an investigation and test of the  system for a detailed examination of every entry. This is both more  economical and is more effective because it is only by examining the  system that he can have evidence that all the transactions are recorded. 

However, in practice, some areas of the firm’s internal controls may not  exist or may be weak. In such cases, the auditor cannot rely on the  controls and other evidence need to be sought for, for the completeness  and accuracy of the record.

3.1.5 Substantive Testing
Substantive testing is defined as: 

…those tests of transactions and balances, and other procedures such as  analytical review, which seek to provide audit evidence as to the  completeness, accuracy and validity of the information contained in the  accounting records or in the financial statements.  You have seen that the reliability of the records is established by the  auditor, by his investigating the system. However, not all data can be  verified in this indirect way. Thus, some transactions, balances and  items in the financial statements must be verified by direct evidence.  In particular, substantive tests are applied to the followings.

(a) Transaction records where internal controls are weak or nonexistent  and where the system cannot be relied on.
(b) Unusual, extraordinary or one-off transactions and transactions  which are not covered by a system. For example, if the client  sold a part of its premises, this transaction is clearly rare and the  client will not have a system for dealing with it, and thus, the  auditor must seek evidence that the transaction was fully and  accurately recorded and was carried out with proper authority. 
(c) All assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date. For some  assets (e.g. debtors and creditors) the system will provide good  audit evidence, but additional audit evidence is always sought. 

In practice, an auditor has to consider on grounds of effectiveness and  cost, whether to rely on systems controls or whether to carry out  substantive tests in each area of audit. In some areas, sufficient  evidence can be obtained by analytical review. In many areas, a  combination of internal control reliance, substantive testing and  analytical review provide the necessary audit evidence. 

3.1.6 Analytical Review Techniques
This is defined as:
…the study of relationships between elements of financial information  expected to conform to a predictable pattern based on the organization’s  experience and between financial and non-financial information.  Information is compared with compatible information for a prior period  or periods, with anticipated results and with information relating to  similar organizations.

In general, audit evidence is gained from internal control, from  substantive tests and increasingly from analytical review.

3.1.7 Analytical Review of Financial Statements
At the conclusion of the detailed work of the audit, when all the systems  testing and substantive testing has been done, the auditor will have audit  evidence that:

(a) proper books of account have been kept which form a reliable  basis for the preparation of accounts;
(b) the accounts have been properly drawn up from those books;
(c) all assets, liabilities and transactions, balances and items in the  account have been confirmed indirectly by systems investigation  and /or directly by substantive testing.

Nonetheless, the auditor will then subject the financial statements to an  overall final analytical review to determine whether:

(i) acceptable, consistent and appropriate accounting policies have  been applied. For example, the accounts would not show a true  and fair view if the depreciation policy had been changed from  straight line to reducing balance without this being disclosed.

(ii) all the information in the financial statements is compatible with  all other information. For example, an industrial firm using  straight line depreciation may have items of plant which have  been fully depreciated. However, in determining product cost for  valuing work in progress and finished goods, notional  depreciation on fully depreciated plant may have been taken.

(iii) all items in the accounts are compatible with the auditor’s  knowledge of the enterprise and its circumstances. For example,  the auditor may have read in the press that new processes have  been invented in a client’s industry which makes some of the  client’s plant obsolete.

 (iv) there is adequate disclosure of all items requesting disclosure.
Numerous disclosure requirements are in the Companies Act and  also some items may require special disclosure for proper  understanding of the accounts.

(v) the accounting requirements of the Companies Act and other  regulations have been complied with.
(vi) overall, the auditor has sufficient evidence to enable him to give  an opinion on the truth and fairness of the accounts.

3.1.8 Preparation and Signing of Report
The ultimate aim of an audit is the report by the auditor to his client.
This is a formal statement giving:
(a) a title identifying the persons to whom the report is addressed  (e.g. Auditors’ report to the members of the ABC Plc.).
(b) an introductory paragraph identifying the financial statements  audited (e.g., Profit and Loss Account, Balance Sheet, etc.).
(c) separate sections, appropriately headed, dealing with:
(i) respective responsibilities of directors and auditors;
(ii) the basis of the auditors’ opinion (We conducted our audit in  accordance with Auditing Standards …..);
(iii) the auditors’ opinion (e.g., the financial statements give a true  and fair view …..).
(d) the manuscript or printed signature of the auditors.
(e) the date of the report.

4.0 CONCLUSION
You must have learnt from the study of this note that:
a. although the stages in conducting the modern audit have been  described, the audit is not done all at one time, but it is spread out  over a period of time.
b. the modern audit is concerned largely with a search for evidence.
Evidence can be of several kinds including;
c. internal control reliance:
i. substantive testing;
ii. analytical review.

5.0 SUMMARY
In this note, you have learnt that modern audit has the following stages:
· Background research into the client’s place in the economy  generally and its industry in particular, the clients’ constitution,  history, operations and personnel;
· Preparation of an audit plan;
· Accounting system review;
· Internal control system review;
· Substantive testing including analytical review techniques;
· Analytical review of financial statements;
· Preparation and signing of the auditor’s report.



 

0 comments:

Post a Comment

DH