1.0 INTRODUCTION
Decision –
making is the responsibility of the Executives. As an individual there are
times that decisions are to be made, the same is applicable to organization. Organizational
decisions are mostly influenced by the awareness of the choices that are
available to the organization and the knowledge of
how to evaluate them.
Decision – making, at whatever level an employee is found, is one of his most
important functions.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
At the end of this note you should be able to:
·
define decision-making
·
locate where decision-making capacity can be enlarged
·
list steps in decision-making process
·
recognize how decision-making ability can be improved.
3.0 MAIN CONTENT
3.1 Definition and Scope
Decision comes from the action word “deciding” which is
freedom to choose from among alternatives without externally imposed coercion, freedom
to conceive alternatives from which to choose. Decisions are made within
boundaries set-up by many constraints most of which are, the prevailing and
unalterable features of the social, political, economic and technological
environment. The individual’s interpretation of the legal, moral, ethnical and
religions limits to possible courses of action.
The locality of the “culture” that has been inherited and
learnt by the individual, at least to the extent that he cannot perceive that
many possible course of action are unavailable to him as a result of his
subconscious interpretation of “Custom”. Here decision – making is seen as a
creative and judicial. By being creative is meant that decision – making is an
imagination in visualizing alternative, which is to consider more, different
and better alternatives. The import of this is that whereas it is possible to
be hemmed in by cultural limits in considering alternatives amongst which to
make a choice, it is also possible and it is creative to do so, to expand the alternatives
and make better decisions.
By Decision – making
being judicial is meant that Decision – making juxtaposes values with facts and
information available as well as the likely impact and consequences of what
each alternative entails. According to
Smiddy, an authority on the concept of Decision – making, “Deciding is a matter
of value, judgement and of wisdom”. The quality of value judgement and of
wisdom, the quality of value judgement will be improved to the extent that they
are influenced by factual rather than erroneous or inaccurate information. It
is an acceptable fact that judgements used in deciding, are value judgements, and
then effective deciding requires a well-developed sense of values, inherent in
the individual decision-maker.
One way to develop
the sense of values of the individual in order to improve his decision- making
ability and thus the quality of his decisions is to orient him towards the
objectives of the organization for which he works. Each decision can be
specifically defined as the responsibility of a specific position. The
incumbent of this position is personally and individually responsible and
accountable for the results and the consequences of the decisions so designated
as his responsibilities.
3.2 Enlarging Decision – Making Capacity
Where a decision is made the sole responsibility of an
individual much as it is advisable to tap the knowledge of others both
colleagues and subordinates, it is crucial to bear in mind that the final
decisions is the responsibility of the one into whose hands it is entrusted.
- Leaders make
decisions and it is made known to the entire staff of the organization. Here
the leader identifies a problem or realizes the existence of such an identified
problem, ponders over possible decisions and chooses one. He at times takes no
input from his subordinates.
- The leader sells
his decision. Here he keeps problems and decision making to himself. However
rather than announce the decision solely made by him, he now sells the decision
to his subordinate through soft persuasion especially, a democratic leader.
- The leader presents
his ideas and invites questions. Here decisions are already made and questions
are invited by the subordinates for the sole purpose of clarification.
- The leader presents a tentative decision subject to
change. Here the leader has thought over the problem and found the solution.
The problem and the tentative solution are rendered for debate but the final
decisions are the leaders.
- The leader presents the problem, gets suggestion and then
makes decision. Here the leader comes up without a pre-concerned solution to
the problem. He uses his group as a resource base to obtain answers. At the end
however, he alone takes the decision.
- The leader defines the limits and requests the groups to
take a decision. Here the leader passes to the group usually with himself as a member,
the right to make decisions. Before doing this, he defines the problem and the
boundaries within which the decision must be made.
- The leader permits the group to make decision within the prescribed
limits. Here the group has absolute freedom to identify and diagnose the problems,
develop alternative procedures for solving it an deciding on the alternative to
use. The executive, depending on the urgency surrounding the issue and the
knowledge of his subordinates may decide to use, any of the enumerated styles
in decision making. However there is a need to a decentralized decision –
making in the organization.
3.3 Steps to Decision-Making
According to Peter Drunker, there are five steps in decision
– making:
- Defining the
problem
- Analyzing the problem
- Developing alternative solutions
- Deciding upon the solution
- Converting the
decision into effective action.
It is pertinent to
state here that not all decision have to go through those five steps in order
for decisions to be made. Management scholars have divided decision–making into
two broad categories:-
- Programmes
- Non- Programmed decisions.
Programmed decisions are those which deal with problems
permitting well–defined search and choice procedures to be used each time they occur.
The problems giving rise to them, are repetitive and so solution can almost be
fabricated. But Non-programmed decisions on the other hand involves problems which
are often new and highly ill-defined making it difficult to tell what factors
are applicable for obtaining a desired solution. Normally for such problems,
need arises to shift the focus of decision making upstairs.
3.4 Improving Decision –Making Ability of Executives
Some decision–making is a product of value judgment and
depends too much on the individual and as individuals are gifted differently,
then can decision-making ability be improved so that the executives can earn benefits.
One way which it can be learnt is picking the brain of successful decision-
maker to catalogue the process he utilizes in so doing, such process can be
studied, adopted and taught.
However, this is not easy as many as good decision makers do
not know how they were made. Another way of improving decision making ability
is making more of them.
The third way of improving in the quality of decisions in
organizations rather than decision–making ability of individuals, is to drop
those who are incapable of making decisions.
4.0 CONCLUSION
This note has examined the topic decision–making. Here the
meaning and scope of decision–making in organization have been given. You have
also been told how it is not the responsibility of only those on top of
organizational hierarchies to make decisions. You have also learnt how
decision–making capacity can be enlarged by the “tapping” of the knowledge of
colleagues and subordinates. You have also learnt how to increase the ability
of decision–making.
5.0 SUMMARY
Decision–making is a critical function in any
organization. It is a personnel function because it is one of the important
things the employee does in organization and in respect of which he is given additional
training and which also forms the basis for his performance appraisal. <<<Previous Note View Course Content Next Note>>>
0 comments:
Post a Comment